errorYou must be logged in to review this story.
schedule
October 13, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Very nice!
schedule
October 6, 2005 at 12:00 AM
I loved, loved, loved this story and cannot wait for the sequel about Keiko and Fluffy!!!!!
schedule
August 13, 2005 at 12:00 AM
GREAT STORY U SHOULD MAKE A SEQUEL THAT FOCUSES ON THE THREESOME!!!
schedule
July 25, 2005 at 12:00 AM
WOW!!! I totally loved this fic. Do you have any other stories on this site?? If so, email me a link! Your work is awesome.
TaiYoukai
TaiYoukai
schedule
July 24, 2005 at 12:00 AM
i love the story
can not wait until the squel
can not wait until the squel
schedule
July 15, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Eep! I loved it! ...Im sad that its over tho, but im looking forward to sesshoumaru! I loooove him so much eeep! *Smacks herself for acting like a silly school girl.* Heh heh. ^_^ Sorry bout that get so excited sometimes. *Jumps up and down.* Okies, well I wanna see the sess keiko story when you do the first chapter so if you havnt started that yet, could you write me when its started, I really wanna read it.Remember my email is DemonMina@yahoo.com
schedule
July 15, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Hm, I was just looking at some of the reviews, and im tellin you this if this story isnt original im very dissapointed in you. But if it is thumbs up to you. Thats all im saying about that.
schedule
June 30, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Yes! Please make a sequel!!! Love the story!!
^_^
^_^
schedule
June 29, 2005 at 12:00 AM
Deleted my review, did you? How very brave. I wonder how many other negative reviews you've deleted? But I'm not upset. Oh, no, far from it. Know this: every time you delete my review, I'll come back and post it again, with added material. Try me.
Allow me to reiterate, since you so kindly deleted my last review: If you are going to use other authors' stories as source material - and it's blatantly obvious that you are - you should, at the very least, do those authors and the readers the courtesy of acknowledging that fact. Better would be asking the author for permission. Better STILL would be writing original scenes. You know what I'm talking about: the scene in Chapter 3 that you took from another fic. I have no desire to drag the maligned author's name into this mess, but you know what I'm talking about. Just because you wrote the scene in your own words doesn't make it yours. Stealing other authors' ideas is plagiarism, plain and simple. You didn't even bother to add your own twist to it.
Since you've done me such kindness by deleting my previous review, I'll be nice in return and point out some other problems with this fic. It's bad enough that you had Kagome deep-throating Hiei during her very first time performing oral sex. WITHOUT losing her lunch in the process. But what really made me giggle was the "internal hymen." Christ, how many of you stupid authors are there? The hymen is NOT INTERNAL. It's NOT INSIDE THE VAGINAL CANAL. It covers most of the ENTRANCE to the vagina. You're a girl, aren't you? It's pathetic how many female authors know so little about their own bodies.
I have more to say, but I'll save it for next time you delete my review. 'Til then.
Allow me to reiterate, since you so kindly deleted my last review: If you are going to use other authors' stories as source material - and it's blatantly obvious that you are - you should, at the very least, do those authors and the readers the courtesy of acknowledging that fact. Better would be asking the author for permission. Better STILL would be writing original scenes. You know what I'm talking about: the scene in Chapter 3 that you took from another fic. I have no desire to drag the maligned author's name into this mess, but you know what I'm talking about. Just because you wrote the scene in your own words doesn't make it yours. Stealing other authors' ideas is plagiarism, plain and simple. You didn't even bother to add your own twist to it.
Since you've done me such kindness by deleting my previous review, I'll be nice in return and point out some other problems with this fic. It's bad enough that you had Kagome deep-throating Hiei during her very first time performing oral sex. WITHOUT losing her lunch in the process. But what really made me giggle was the "internal hymen." Christ, how many of you stupid authors are there? The hymen is NOT INTERNAL. It's NOT INSIDE THE VAGINAL CANAL. It covers most of the ENTRANCE to the vagina. You're a girl, aren't you? It's pathetic how many female authors know so little about their own bodies.
I have more to say, but I'll save it for next time you delete my review. 'Til then.
schedule
June 29, 2005 at 12:00 AM
"Not woman enough to leave a name?" That's rich. Here's a clue, sweetie: the entire internet is anonymous. What would it mean to you if I told you my name is Annabeth? Does that make my review more valid? Do you ask for ID when people leave you good reviews, or is it just for the bad ones? If you're going to be ridiculous, at least be consistently ridiculous. Sadly, your deduction that I'm the victimized author is incorrect. While I am acquainted with the author whose scene and ideas you took, I am not her. That doesn't stop me from recognizing her ideas, or being indignant when someone steals them without credit.
Oh, and equating immaturity with being male...how nice to see that you're sexist, too. Not to mention illogical. "Don't like, don't read" is about the stupidest thing an author can say. How am I supposed to know I won't like it if I don't read it? I may be intelligent, but I'm not psychic. Yes, some people liked what you wrote. Huzzah for them. Perhaps when they're older, their tastes will improve. Now explain why you felt it necessary to delete my original review, if you're so confident that everything you've written is entirely your idea. It smacks of a guilty conscience to me.
You want names? I'll sign this review with four. Annabeth Pierre Meherchand Takanaka. Satisfied?
Oh, and equating immaturity with being male...how nice to see that you're sexist, too. Not to mention illogical. "Don't like, don't read" is about the stupidest thing an author can say. How am I supposed to know I won't like it if I don't read it? I may be intelligent, but I'm not psychic. Yes, some people liked what you wrote. Huzzah for them. Perhaps when they're older, their tastes will improve. Now explain why you felt it necessary to delete my original review, if you're so confident that everything you've written is entirely your idea. It smacks of a guilty conscience to me.
You want names? I'll sign this review with four. Annabeth Pierre Meherchand Takanaka. Satisfied?